By Veronika Jakopič
Signe Ivask, an assistant professor, researcher, and lecturer, presented a lecture titled "The Influence of New Technology and Disinformation on Journalists' Working Practices."
She explored the effects of these factors on journalists' work, sharing insights into their initial resistance to new technologies, their evolving role, and concerns about job security. Ivask also delved into the profound influence of disinformation, the essential role of fact-checkers, and the challenges journalists face in the age of new technologies.
Ivask’s research revealed that many journalists were initially hesitant to integrate new technologies into their work. Accustomed to traditional methods of story capture, they found the digital revolution a challenging adaptation. This resistance is common, as people generally dislike changes in routines. Journalists, like others, worry about job loss due to new technologies and AI. However, as discussed in previous lectures, automation is unlikely to replace journalists completely. Instead, technology is poised to augment their abilities, complementing their work. Over time, journalists are recognizing the potential benefits that technology brings to their reporting. Ivask noted a shift in identity, with some journalists now referring to themselves as media workers, reflecting the profession's evolving nature and the need for tech-savviness.
Amidst new technologies, Ivask highlighted the prevalence and detrimental effects of disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation in the media landscape. Disinformation is intentionally false or misleading information created to cause harm, while misinformation is the sharing of inaccurate information without malicious intent. Malinformation involves disseminating accurate information with the intent to harm. These challenges make maintaining credibility and accurate reporting increasingly difficult for journalists.
Fact-checkers have become crucial in countering disinformation, but their role in relation to traditional journalism is complex. While fact-checkers are vital for verifying information and employ specific methods for accuracy, they are not necessarily traditional journalists. Ivask pointed out challenges, such as instances where fact-checkers might inadvertently harm journalists or contribute to misinformation spread. Maintaining high standards and transparency in fact-checking processes is crucial, with regular evaluations and accountability measures ensuring accuracy and integrity.
Ivask emphasized the importance of questioning who checks the fact-checkers, highlighting the need for accountability and transparency in their work. Promoting media literacy enables the public to critically evaluate information and engage in their own fact-checking, adding a layer of verification to the integrity of journalistic efforts. As the media landscape evolves, continuous dialogue and collaboration are essential to uphold journalism as a trustworthy source of truth amid the challenges of disinformation.
